We Can-Can: A Podcast on Sexuality & Disability

By Nidhi Goyal

img_3467The platform was developed as a resource by and for women living with disabilities, to fill a gap in resources on sexual rights, including sexual pleasure. In this podcast Nidhi Goyal shares insights and experiences in developing the platform, working on sexual pleasure with girls and women living with disabilities, and how to challenge social myopia on these issues.

Transcript (18:09)


Hello everybody. This is Nidhi Goyal from Mumbai, India, and I’m here to talk to you today about sexuality and pleasure; and what does that mean for a woman with a disability? The discussion today is called, ‘We Can-Can’.


Let’s begin with a visual. What comes to your mind when I say a woman with a disability?


Maybe you paint a picture of a woman who can’t see. Or a woman who can’t walk. Or a woman who cannot talk, or hear, or speak. But do we ever focus on what this woman can do? Somewhere in our minds we consider women with disabilities less than woman. We only focus on them, or look at them, as someone who would need care. Someone who would need assistance. Someone who would need some rehabilitation. Period.


We maybe also consider them less than human being. That would explain why we would never think of what she would feel, what she would want, what she would need, and what she desires.


Keeping this in mind, and really with the thought of talking to the woman within, or inside, the woman with the disability, we researched and launched an online platform called


What was this platform about? It really spoke about the sexual rights of women with disabilities. It spoke to them about their bodies, about their lives, about their identity. Because women really look for someone like them. For example, the woman in a wheelchair, who was looking for an image of her playing sport. The woman who couldn’t hear, who really still wanted to dance to the music and socialize with others. We really wanted to talk to these women, and then, was born.


So what does speak about? It spoke about the spectrum of sexuality. We really began the conversation about talking to women with disabilities about their bodies. The bodies which may not look like someone else’s. The body which looked different. Which felt different. Which smelled different.


We also spoke to them about their sexuality; about their needs, their wants, their desires. We spoke to them about relationships; relationships with themselves, relationships with others, relationships with that one special person. We moved on to talking about marriage, and what it would mean to negotiate this institution.


We then spoke about parenting, and what it would mean if a woman who did not have hands, wanted to wipe the bottom of her baby; the woman who could not see, who wanted to feed her baby with her hands; the woman who could not hear, who wanted to soothe or calm her crying child.


We then moved on to talking about violence and violations, and what that meant about everyday discrimination that women with disabilities faced. We really wanted to address the complexities of exiting violence. What would it meant to ‘walk out’, when you were in a wheelchair? What would it even mean to raise your voice, when you could not hear and you could not speak?


It was amazing, that when I research and co-authored this website with other colleagues at Point of View, that there was no single unified resource available online talking about the spectrum of sexuality. Really talking to in a positive lens, and really considering them to be sexual beings.


While we were researching this website, we were assured of its importance and its need; because, women in their 20s did not know what their bodies, or those of the opposite sex looked like. Women in their 30s, did not know what were their pleasure points, what was orgasm. Women in their 40s, were still puzzling over whether in the social scheme of things, they were “marriageable materials”. It was very, very empowering, and very touching, to listen to the stories and to write about them, that women with disabilities shared in their everyday lives.


I’ll narrate one of their stories here:


There was a woman who was a burn survivor, an acid attack burn survivor. She spoke to us about her experience finding a partner. Many of her friends, her close family, and society at large told her:


‘…You know, your face is disfigured. Um, yeah, you look different. Why don’t you marry a man [because she was heterosexual] , who is visually impaired. Because then he would not care about you not looking beautiful.’


This story was extremely telling about how much emphasis we lay on beauty. How normative our thinking is around beauty and its standards; and how, when we think that someone doesn’t meet a particular social standard or normative idea that we have set in our minds, we think of them as defective. As less.


Hence, we want them to be paired with one other who is defective, or less, or who is not “normal”. So the emphasis moves away from the connection in a relationship; from the spark of love, from the spark of sexual attraction; and just remains with disability.


It’s amazing how when we talk about sexuality and pleasure, we never think of it with disability, or we never think of that combination.


In the recent past, there was a film that was released called Margarita with a Straw. It was an Indian film, and it was amazing because the community of people with disabilities was really exited. They thought, ‘finally!’, a narrative which echoed their realities. A narrative of a young woman with a disability who is a complete prankster; who had her dreams, her ambitions, her circle of friends, her heartbreaks…and her naughtiness.


Well, this was one side of the story. There were other reactions. This particular reaction that stood out for me, this open letter that was written:


You should be ashamed of yourselves.


I’m not quoting them here, but paraphrasing.


The filmmaker should have been ashamed of herself, for even thinking that people with disabilities or women with disabilities thought about sex and sexuality. What rubbish! There were so many more important things in their lives. They needed to think about rehabilitation. They needed to think about medicalization. They need to think about corrective surgeries! They need to think about survival. They need to think about education employment. There is no time for sexuality. It’s not even on their radar.


If sexuality is not a priority for women with disabilities, it is not a priority for anyone. Because even if you’re not disabled, at age 1 you’re really learning and struggling to walk; at 2, you’re struggling to talk; at 4, you’re struggling to read and write; at 10, education is your priority. Later, social interactions is. Then ambitions is, career is, and so on and so forth.


If sexuality, desires, pleasure, and relationships are not a need or a priority for people with disabilities, they cannot be a need or priority for people without disabilities, can they?


But why do we separate this conversation? Because relationship, desires, intimacy are something that’s in our personal space; and you know when we talk about disability, we somewhere are very uncomfortable to bring disability into our personal spaces. We can talk about them in a development context. We can really talk about them in a political context. But when it domes to personal spaces, it is us, and they are them.


The fact that women with disabilities have to prioritize, or do not feel the need for sexuality, its false. And how do I say it so confidently? I’ll give you an example here.


When we began extending the reach of our online platform,, we started reaching out to women with disabilities through disability rights organizations—in their homes, in their institutes, etc. and providing accessible trainings on disability and sexuality.


At one such workshop for visually impaired girls, I remember we were having a conversation on things they had never done and wanted to do. We got fascinating answers. These were girls from rural India, who’d come together in a city to receive livelihoods education and rehabilitation. And they said,


‘You know, we’ve not travelled out of the state, and we’d like to travel. We want to wear jeans. We want to look modern.’


Then we were talking about what kind of conversations would they want to have, and what would they want to know? They said various things, but one thing was missing, so I stood up and I said,


“Hey girls, don’t you want to know about sex?”


Guess what the reply was?


There wasn’t silence.


There wasn’t discomfort.


There was an uproar.


There was an uproar of affirmative, positive, “Yes!”, and there was an uproar of giggles and laughter and smiles.


That really was very telling. That told us that desire and pleasure is not very far away from the mind of a woman with a disability.


Yes, if you made a comparison that way, patriarchy says that ‘No woman thinks of desire, no woman thinks of pleasure; that’s not important in her life’.


Similarly, there is an abelist patriarchy, which says ‘Women with disabilities do not think about desires, and have no needs, and do not want or prioritize pleasure in their lives’.


Through our workshops we also try and open up conversations about relationships. When we started writing the website I distinctly remember one of the disabled women asking me:

“How would you create rights around relationships? It’s not a legal right.”


Yes, it is not a legal right., but it is something that everyone has a right to engage with, to experience. At many of our workshops when we’re talking about relationships, the conversation goes something like this:


I, as a facilitator and trainer ask, “What kind of partner would you like to be with?” A common enough question, considering that every person gets asked this by their siblings, by their parents, by their families, by their friends, by their peers, and so on.


So I ask the girls, what kind of partner would they like to be with? And if I put this question to non-disabled women, they say: ‘MaybeMaybe I would like a partner who matches my intellect’. Or someone else would say, ‘Maybe I’d like a partner who travels, because I love travelling too’. Someone else would say, ‘Maybe I’d like someone who is calm and composed, because I am not’. And so on.


But when I put this question to girls and women with disabilities, they come up with responses more like this: “Well, I think, I would like someone who does not have the same disability as I have. How would we manage if both are blind?’”


Someone else would say, “I think I would like my partner to be with the same disability as I have. Only then we’ll be able to understand each other. So I will be hearing and speech impaired, and they will be hearing and pseekch impaired, and that would be fantastic because we would really really understand our world


Someone else would say, “I just have a polio issue, I want a non-disabled partner. I don’t want anyone with a disability”.


If you notice, the conversation starts and revolves around disability. Because disability is such an identity marker, it fogs everything else; and as society diminishes people with disabilities, this is what they do to themselves. They remove the person, and only reduce themselves to the disability; and in every conversation that’s reflected.


This, is really the influence of the non-disabled society, and their myopia on disability and relationships.


Taking about relationships, I had very recently read an article in one of the global newspapers or magazines talking about how 50 Shades of Grey has really opened exciting opportunities and possibilities. They really emphasized on how fantastic blindfold sex can be, and that’s something that 50 Shades of Grey has apparently taught people.




I wish people would have just spoken to visually impaired persons. I wonder why it took a book and film for us to register that sex can be beautiful in creative ways. Maybe because that’s because we have very, very normative ideas. We have ideas that are set in stone; ideas on pleasure, ideas on sex, and definitely ideas on relationships.

It’s basically a vision or a view that matters. So when you say myopia, that’s a view. When you talk about having different views for different people, or different gazes for different people—that would apply to women with disabilities.


What do I mean by this? For example, if a woman—woman, not a disabled woman—if a woman is in a relationship, she goes to work, and she shares the chores with her partner; she is considered to be a modern woman who knows her rights, and an empowered woman.


If she’s a woman who has a partner, who has a job, and who has a baby--but she hires a nanny to take care of the baby; she is again considered to be a very empowered woman, and someone who balances her life beautifully.


If there is a woman with a disability whose working, who is educated, who has a partner, and who has a baby, and hires a nanny to take care of the baby—the focus shifts from her empowerment to her disability. Because people are quick at pointing out, saying ‘Anyway, she’s a woman with a disability, she would need help’.


If her partner chopped and she cooked, the question would again be, ‘Oh she’s disabled? Of course she couldn’t chop the vegetables’. It’s amazing how the discourse then shifts from empowerment to disability again.


So it’s basically the view that influences our thoughts, and which then influences the woman with a disability herself; where she starts internalizing the stigma, the prejudice, the myopia that we have.


And this is a situation where women with disabilities like me, have to still stand up and talk to you today and say,


'Sexuality, pleasure, desires—everything is for me, because I can-can".


Thank you very much.


*    *    *    *    *

About the Contributor

Nidhi Goyal is a disabled feminist from India, committed to changing the lives of women and girls with disabilities. She is the Sexuality & Disability Program Director at the non-profit Point of View, where she researched and co-authored a pioneering online initiative—a comprehensive online resource on disability, gender, sexuality and violence. Extending the reach of this platform, Nidhi designs and delivers accessible trainings across India and across impairments. Nidhi actively advocates at policy and legislative levels in India, raising the profile of issues at the intersection of gender & disability through op-eds, journal articles, lectures. Nidhi also consults with a range of national and global women’s rights and human rights organizations. She is a researcher for Human Rights Watch and serves as regular faculty at CREA Institutes on sexuality, gender and rights. Nidhi is also on the board of ‘Standing Tall’ – an Indian affiliate of Handicap International; the advisory board of “Voice”, a grant making facility by Dutch Ministry; and served on the International Planning Committee of the AWID Forum. Finally, she is a standup comic artist who uses humour to challenge prevalent notions around disability, gender and sexuality, and has performed in three countries within six months of her debut. You can read more about Nidhi’s work @saysnidhigoyal.